FCRA Compliant SSNT Product

フォローする

Evan N.

• 2022年11月30日 18:16

User Story: 

As a CRA, I would like to use an FCRA Complaint SSNT product. 

Current Behavior:

Currently, the system does not show SSNT results on the final report.
Additionally, the system does not support a dispute process for SSNT results.

Potential Enhancement:

I would use an FCRA Compliant SSNT product which would allow me, as a CRA, to support subject disputes and add SSNT results to the final report.

 

4

• 正式なコメント

  

  Evan N.

  • 2022年12月02日 16:45

  Hello Everyone,
  
  Thank you so much for your quick feedback and questions. If we were to make this solution available, we would add the ability to assign clients to either SSNT option. 

  コメントアクション パーマリンク
• 

  Gordon Basichis

  • 2022年11月30日 18:25

  We would be interesting, depending on the final cost and the overall efficacy of the search.

  0

  コメントアクション パーマリンク
• 

  Ryan Sandberg

  • 2022年11月30日 18:33

  We would regularly use this search as soon as it’s available.

  0

  コメントアクション パーマリンク
• 

  Matthew Rodgers

  • 2022年11月30日 18:41

  We would have a high level of interest in this product. 

  0

  コメントアクション パーマリンク
• 

  Tricia Havis

  • 2022年11月30日 18:49

  We would not be interested in this feature.  Our clients can currently view the results of the SSN trace when they are logged into the system.  I believe there will be too many time consuming issues and/or complaints if the full results of the SSN trace are on the final report.  I prefer it the way it is -- the information is redacted just like the dob and full ssn.  That to me, is a better way to keep it.

  0

  コメントアクション パーマリンク
• 

  Pierre Rhodes

  • 2022年11月30日 18:52

  We don't have any issues (except that it doesnt have logic or filters) with the current system and prefer to have it turned off for clients and applicants. If it does become available, please make it so that it can be turned on or off based on client needs. Thanks.

  0

  コメントアクション パーマリンク
• 

  Joe Degenhardt

  • 2022年11月30日 18:54

  Can we still use the standard SSN Trace for some clients and use this FCRA compliant product for other clients?

  0

  コメントアクション パーマリンク
• 

  Jason Reynolds

  • 2022年11月30日 20:17

  We would be 100% interested in this. Please let us know when it is readily available. This is a great asset!

  0

  コメントアクション パーマリンク
• 

  Chris Heath

  • 2022年11月30日 21:35

  We would have a high level of interest in this product, though cost is also a determining factor.  Along with a previous post, will we still use the standard SSN Trace for some clients and use this FCRA compliant product for other clients?

  0

  コメントアクション パーマリンク
• 

  Robert Harada

  • 2022年11月30日 22:27

  I'd be interested in offering this as long as we had the choice between the two products (current SSNT / proposed FCRA Compliant SSNT).

  0

  コメントアクション パーマリンク
• 

  Joe Gonzalez Jr

  • 2022年12月01日 00:29

  I would also be interested provided we are still able to offer current non-FCRA SSNT and FCRA compliant SSNT. By the way, current SSNT sometimes (maybe 1 out of every 10) shows slightly different DOBs than applicant input, and we have to spend extra to go externally and validate.

  0

  コメントアクション パーマリンク
• 

  Melissa Drumheller

  • 2022年12月09日 15:58

  Our clients can already see this information when they login to the system. I think it would generate too many unnecessary questions given that years ago the verified/year issued table used to how on the final report and it generated tons of questions. I also believe our compliance team prefers it not be on there.

  I think a dispute process would be helpful though. We used to get calls from applicants about AKAs or addresses that didn't belong to them and we didn't have a solid course of action for them.

  0

  コメントアクション パーマリンク
• 

  Tara Fried

  • 2022年12月16日 18:12

  I feel it might open a can of worms… these were my initial thoughts:

  • I’m assuming that it’ll have a strict 7-year, based on the “FCRA compliant” phrase, but then there are clients that may want more flexibility or more years…(?) Is there options of more than just 7-years?

  • “Supported dispute process”
  • I believe this would mean clients being able to tier them in grading, as well?
  • I’m not sure how that would look(?)
  • Since we don’t have a say in the results from our vendors, (isn’t it more of a database dump(?)), I’d be interested in how you would “fix” or “update” the results?

   

  0

  コメントアクション パーマリンク
• 

  Katrina Adams

  • 2023年05月16日 20:30

  We would not utilize this service based on our policies and procedures. Thanks! 

  0

  コメントアクション パーマリンク

サインインしてコメントを残してください。